The Xcode 3.1 Developer Tools install both the standard GNU compiler, gcc, and the LLVM compiler, llvm-gcc. I thought I’d try my hand at compiling something with LLVM, so naturally I decided to update my instructions for compiling Rsync 3 as a Universal Binary for Leopard. Let’s try Rsync 3.0.3!
The following set of instructions, of course, requires that you have already installed the Xcode 3.1, available as a download from Apple. To choose LLVM as your C compiler temporarily for this compile, specify the CC=“/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc” variable (as explained in the LLVM FAQ).
$ cd /tmp
$ curl -O curl -O http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ tar -xzvf rsync-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ rm rsync-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ curl -O http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ tar -xzvf rsync-patches-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ rm rsync-patches-3.0.3.tar.gz
$ cd rsync-3.0.3
$ patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff
$ patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff
$ ./prepare-source
$ env CFLAGS="-O -g -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 \
-arch ppc7400 -arch ppc970 -arch ppc64 -arch x86_64" LDFLAGS="-arch i386 \
-arch ppc7400 -arch ppc970 -arch ppc64 -arch x86_64" \
CC="/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc" \
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-dependency-tracking
$ make
$ ./rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 64-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, xattrs, no iconv, symtimes, file-flags
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you
are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU
General Public Licence for details.
$ file ./rsync
./rsync: Mach-O universal binary with 5 architectures
./rsync (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386
./rsync (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O executable ppc
./rsync (for architecture ppc970): Mach-O executable ppc
./rsync (for architecture ppc64): Mach-O 64-bit executable ppc64
./rsync (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
$ lipo -info ./rsync
Architectures in the fat file: ./rsync are: i386 ppc7400 ppc970 ppc64 x86_64
$ sudo make install
Warning: I have not tested Rsync 3 compiled with LLVM to ensure that it operates at all or is compatible with Rsync compiled by GCC. I haven’t compared the compilation speed against GCC’s performance, determined whether the files are larger/smaller, or have produced a more optimized binary. You use the software compiled with these instructions at your own risk.
Most of the original instructions were helpfully documented by Mike Bombich. My contributions are simply:
When you have the print queue window open for a printer in Mac OS X Leopard, the Printer menu > Print Test Page command is active. That command sends the CUPS test page to the selected print queue.
The test page file itself is a PostScript document located at this path:
/usr/share/cups/data/testprint.ps
Since Leopard — like Mac OS X versions since Panther, has a built-in PostScript interpreter — you can open up this PostScript document and have it rendered as a PDF. By default, it will be sent to the Preview application.
It’s helpful to be able to view this document on-screen, so you can see what it is supposed to look like, in case your printer is not working as intended. You can compare the on-screen results with the printed output to verify how well your printer is working.
Mac OS X has a type of URL specifically for opening UNIX man pages. For me, using one of these URLs opens a new Terminal window to display the man page. Just put the name of the man page after the “x-man-page://” URL scheme to create one of these URLs.
For example, a link to the rsync man page would look like “x-man-page://rsync” when written out.
This is a handy way to refer to UNIX man pages with other Mac OS X users in e-mail correspondence, on mailing lists, or on the Web. Because of that, I wanted a quicker way to create these man page URLs. I wrote the Mac OS X Service named “Man Page URL for Command” to satisfy that desire. The “Man Page URL for Command” Service is provided “as-is” with no warranty.
The Service was wrapped up with ThisService by Peter Hosey, as with my earlier Mac OS X Service to shorten a URL with Bit.ly.
To install the Service:
To use it:
Thanks to Nigel for the inspiration.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| ManPageUrlForCommand.zip | 34.45 KB |
There can be times when you need to troubleshoot Directory Services in Mac OS X during system starts up. Directory Services apparently sits above and below the kernel — depending on what each of those components needs to do — so having debugging capability early on in the boot process can help you hone in on problems.
To enable debug logging at startup, run the following at the command line:
$ touch /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/.DSLogDebugAtStart
… and then, on the next restart, debug logging will be enabled. This is equivalent to running:
$ sudo killall -USR1 DirectoryService
… but the advantage is is that debug logging begins at startup, rather than whenever you can log in and start it manually.
Remove the file from the path above when you want to disable the logging for the subsequent restart. As a file whose name starts with a dot, you won’t see it listed by default in the Finder. (The Finder hides dot files by default.)
$ rm /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/.DSLogDebugAtStart
Since the Bit.ly URL-shortening service is all the rage lately, and I hadn’t seen anyone create a Mac OS X Service for it yet, I decided to try my hand at it.
Here’s the result. The core is a relatively simple Python script and requires Mac OS X 10.5 (or Python 2.5 if you have an earlier version of Mac OS X). The Service was wrapped up with ThisService by Peter Hosey. It’s my first attempt at creating a Mac OS X Service — with or without ThisService — and I hope it works for you. However, it is provided “as-is” with no warranty.
That said, if you have comments or suggestions, please feel free to contact me.
Also, I’m not counting this as an endorsement of Bit.ly; I just looked at info on their site and thought I could probably script it and, as you can see, I did.
To install the Service:
To use it:
Of special note, however, is that if you shorten URLs with Bit.ly this way rather than through your browser, you probably won’t see them show up in your history (the most recent 15 URLs you’ve shortened). The script just shortens URLs for you and does so outside of your browser, so whatever cookies or other tracking Bit.ly is doing to generate your history, it doesn’t appear to carry over when using this simple little Service.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| ShortenUrlWithBitly.zip | 34.17 KB |
In trying to determine the age of the command file on a Radmind client — in this case, a Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard system — I learned that its modification date is the same as on the server. This is true on multiple clients I examined, so I believe it to be both consistent and intentional. It also makes sense.
What timestamp, then, can you use to determine how old your command file is, or when your client last updated?
Let’s look into this. For example, here is the command file on a client:
[RadmindClientA]$ ls -ul /private/var/radmind/client | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 667 Jun 3 05:30 command.K
[RadmindClientA]$ ls -cl /private/var/radmind/client | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 667 May 29 10:28 command.K
[RadmindClientA]$ ls -l /private/var/radmind/client | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 667 May 29 10:21 command.K
And the same file examined on the server:
[RadmindServer]$ ls -ul /private/var/radmind/command | grep selected-client-command.K
-rw-r----- 1 root wheel 667 Jun 3 05:27 selected-client-command.K
[RadmindServer]$ ls -cl /private/var/radmind/command | grep selected-client-command.K
-rw-r----- 1 root wheel 667 May 29 10:21 selected-client-command.K
[RadmindServer]$ ls -l /private/var/radmind/command | grep selected-client-command.K
-rw-r----- 1 root wheel 667 May 29 10:21 selected-client-command.K
The status change time (ls -cl) is a little bit harder to understand. I’ve seen it minutes apart from the modification time on a client, but it is the same as the modification time when viewed on the server.
The access time (ls -ul) of the command file on the client, however, simply corresponds to when ktcheck last ran.
For good measure, another client:
[RadmindClientB]$ ls -ul /private/var/radmind/client/ | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 5 05:08 command.K
[RadmindClientB]$ ls -cl /private/var/radmind/client/ | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 3 14:13 command.K
[RadmindClientB]$ ls -l /private/var/radmind/client/ | grep command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 3 14:09 command.K
And its command file on the server:
[RadmindServer]$ ls -ul /private/var/radmind/command | grep another-selected-client-command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 4 05:13 another-selected-client-command.K
[RadmindServer]$ ls -cl /private/var/radmind/command | grep another-selected-client-command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 3 14:09 another-selected-client-command.K
[RadmindServer]$ ls -l /private/var/radmind/command | grep another-selected-client-command.K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1188 Jun 3 14:09 another-selected-client-command.K
I looked into this because I was wondering why ktcheck -C (to “clean” the /private/var/radmind/client directory) wasn’t having the effect I expected. I thought it cleared out the client directory and started with fresh files, which would all have new timestamps because they were new to the client. When I didn’t get the new timestamps I anticipated, I worked through what I saw until I settled on this explanation.
The result? The main means you have of determining whether the command file has been updated is its access time. The access timestamp corresponds with the date and time of the last ktcheck action. This appears to be the case no matter which flags I’ve used with ktcheck — even with ktcheck -n (where “no files are modified”).
The modification time, for all intents and purposes, only indicates when the file was last changed on the server. Testing this out — with command files that have been overwritten with the exact same contents (using cat), as well as command files deleted on the client before ktcheck — I have reached the conclusion that the modification time changes only when the file contents do.
So, I don’t have solid explanations for all of this. But, I’m now armed with the knowledge that the access timestamp is the most important when you’re looking for the age — or at least the last refresh time — of a Radmind client’s command file.
I’ve been thinking for a few months that Mac OS X 10.6 (or the like) would be introduced to developers at WWDC 2008. I’ve said as much to those unfortunate enough to be within earshot. I haven’t mentioned it here … and in recent days I’ve felt less confident about this gut feeling based on the public WWDC session schedule.
If Apple was trying to return to an 18-month release cycle for Mac OS X, my thought process went (after the CEO announced just such a push), a developer preview would almost have to be shown at this WWDC. That has lingered in the back of my mind. It also provided a reason to go to the conference if you were interested more in the Mac track than the iPhone.
Now there are rumors flying around, based on various strings in Apple software and from other sources, that there will be a preview release of Mac OS X 10.6 at WWDC. And it’s being referred to with the moniker, “Snow Leopard.”
If, as these rumors say, the upgrade will focus on reliability and security, then the general lack of room for schedules on it is more plausible. The name distinguishes it little from Leopard, but maybe just enough.
However, unless this release were more like the free-with-$20 shipping Mac OS X 10.1 update, who would buy it? Would Apple charge $129 retail for stability and security? It seems that there would have to be more.
I can definitely see that security could be enhanced by greater adoption of certain features — some reasonable candidates for further enhancement since Leopard — which are the focus of several sessions at WWDC, according to the published schedule.
Since I’m always watching for when old rumors swing back around, I’d guess that one additional change we could see is the mythical “Illuminous” user interface. (Assuming, of course, that this is not the unified interface style we already have in Leopard.) It usually takes two years for fun old rumors to become reality, if they ever do — that’s enough time for many to have forgotten about them and for actual development work to have taken place. A new interface with a new name would jack up the value of a new OS in some people’s minds. Moreso if it actually works better than the old one.
If the lack of PowerPC support were true, then this would be an astounding announcement. It would cut off upgrades for a large (but ever-decreasing) percentage of the Mac population. Already, Leopard itself was limited to G5s and the newest G4s. This could have an interesting effect on those institutional customers who bought G5s for their compute power. Let’s recall that although the Intel Macs have been out since January 2006 and the transition was relatively quick, the high end Power Mac and Xserve systems were the last to be replaced. For a while yet, there can still be Apple PowerPC-based systems that are less than three years old.
Ah, we’ll see what happens Monday. You never know with rumors. I have no inside information and even I wouldn’t make any important decisions based on these musings.
In Leopard, launchd has some options that can tailor your now-working LaunchAgents for specific circumstances. For example, if you want your LaunchAgent to run only when a user has logged in at the Aqua console — rather than SSH or other login sessions — you can use the “LimitLoadToSessionType” key:
<key>LimitLoadToSessionType</key>
<string>Aqua</string>
Note that to find events that have been limited in this way, you must use launchctl’s “-S” flag to specify the session type. Otherwise, launchctl won’t find jobs that are specified for a different kind of session than the current one, as per Levi Brown’s post.
I also found the “LimitLoadToHosts” and “LimitLoadFromHosts” keys when looking this topic up in the launchd.plist man page.
Thanks to James Bucanek for mentioning this on the launchd-dev list.
Drat! I’ve learned that the commands module for Python, which I use, is deprecated and removed in Python according to PEP 3108. That means I can no longer safely call commands.getstatusoutput() anymore. I’ve frequently used this call in the past because it seemed the sanest, easiest way to call for a shell utility and get both its output and return status (for success or error).
I’ll have to find some other way to perform the same function — preferably one that will work on Python 2.3 from Mac OS X Tiger, Python 2.5.1 from Leopard, and future Pythons. The stated replacement for a number of similar modules (including popen2, which frankly kind-of frightened me off with its name) is the subprocess module from PEP 324, but I don’t know if that will work for my purposes.
There are also a bunch of Mac-specific modules being removed. I don’t use any of them right now, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t have been useful.
This kind of thing is spirit-crushing to me for some reason. I’m especially annoyed that Python has been around for so long and it is still reorganizing the ways it calls shell commands. Just settle on something! It seems hard to take it seriously as a system administration scripting language when things like this happen.
On the other hand, I love so much of the Python Standard Library, which has afforded me a lot for system administration …
Under normal circumstances, the latest Radmind tools that communicate with the server report client status updates in the Radmind server’s system log. These standard messages can include ones like:
May 8 03:14:56 RadmindServerHost radmind[7890]: report radmind-client.example.com 192.168.7.42 - - ktcheck No updates needed
May 15 03:15:25 RadmindServerHost radmind[24531]: report radmind-client.example.com 192.168.7.42 - - ktcheck Updates retrieved
May 15 03:21:48 RadmindServerHost radmind[24534]: report radmind-client.example.com 192.168.7.42 - - lapply Changes applied successfully
May 15 03:31:07 RadmindServerHost radmind[24356]: report radmind-client.example.com 192.168.7.42 CertificateCN - lapply Error, changes made
The Radmind repo, or “report,” tool provides the ability to send arbitrary messages to the Radmind server process. But how are these messages formatted and sent?
$ repo -e "Debug" -h radmindserverhost.example.com -w2 "Test message"
… results in the system log message:
May 15 03:31:56 RadmindServerHost radmind[25236]: report radmind-client.example.com 192.168.7.42 CertificateCN - Debug Test message
Here, we can see that an entry created with repo looks like the standard Radmind log messages above. The client hostname and IP address are reported after the “report” text. The CertificateCN for the client — if the highest authorization level is specified (with the -w2 flag) — is also listed; if not, a dash takes its place. I haven’t seen a case where the second dash is substituted, however.
Finally, where the Radmind command/tool used would normally be, the “event” specified by repo will printed. After that, the message text appears.
The value proposition is that if you’re using Radmind, the repo command can help you send arbitrary messages to the server for logging. As bonus, if you’ve taken the time and effort to build the certificate infrastructure for Radmind, you can send these messages securely between the clients and the server cloaked in SSL.
If you’re using multiple servers, you may want to combine their logs in one location so that you can get all of the clients’ reports in one location. You may also want or need to retain these reports for more time. In either case, determine what policies you should apply to the syslog or Apple System Logger (ASL, for Mac OS X) configuration for your server systems.
Whether or not you use repo, it’s good to know that the tools do some logging. The logging can be followed to try to determine the status of your clients, or whether they are failing their updates.
Unfortunately, the most common client failures I have seen tend to involve the lapply tool, and the default level of detail I’ve seen reported back to the server does not provide an indication of what problem has been encountered. You see only that there was an error. Still, even though you may not get enough detail to remotely resolve the problem, it’s something for you to go by find problems in the first place.