Jaharmi’s Irreality renewable hyperlinks with 0% transfat since 1999

It’s certainly an understatement to say that there’s been a lot of talk about the Adobe Flash Player on Apple platforms in the last year. On Mac OS X, Apple bundles the Flash Player and tends to distribute some — but not all — updates to it.

I wanted compare the bundled Flash Player version against the latest version from Adobe, which is currently v10.1.82.76. So, let’s look at what comes with Snow Leopard from the perspective of a codesigned executable.

A quick look at the bundled plugin shows that it is codesigned. This means that it has a known signature. If the executable is modified, the signature will no longer be valid. The signature is tied to the identity of a signing authority, which is generally the source of the software.

It may be helpful to think of codesigning as a tamper-resistant seal from the manufacturer. It’s not going to protect you from lots of different kinds of vulnerabilities, but if its cryptographic signature is intact and valid, you have a good idea that the software hasn’t been modified by a third party.

Mac OS X Leopard and Snow Leopard have shipped with applications signed by Apple. The Flash Player plugin comes from Adobe. So, who signs the bundled Flash Player?

You’d be forgiven for not having your eye drawn to the answer immediately, but it’s right there on the “Authority” lines. Just as with the rest of Mac OS X, Apple signed the Flash Player plugin they bundled with the OS.

Now, let’s upgrade the plugin to the latest version available from Adobe and see what happens to the signature. Courtesy of Preston’s WatchedInstall tool, we can see that the plugin’s CodeResources file is removed during this upgrade. Interestingly, the “Adobe Flash Player Install Manager” application installed with the update is codesigned.

The newer Flash Player version, however, seems to consist of two new plugins contained within the overall structure of a parent plugin. Neither the parent nor the new applications within the same bundle install a new code signature. This results in three unsigned executables:

Therefore, you trade the known security vulnerabilities of the older version of Flash Player bundled with the operating system with a different kind of security problem with the new version. It would be silly to not make that trade if you are browsing the Web at all on a Snow Leopard-based computer.

However, it’s also difficult to understand why a large corporation with the resources of Adobe cannot codesign a piece of software as critical to the Mac OS X browsing experience as the Adobe Flash plugin is — especially when its “Install Manager” application is signed.

It’s also puzzling why Apple continues to trail well behind the latest releases of Flash Player. Add to that mystery the question of why Apple never updates the absolutely antique bundled version of the Shockwave Player plugin.

The McAfee DAT update 5958 was issued on April 21, 2010, and created quite a situation. Heretofore, I will remember what transpired as “the events of April 21.”

I think that someday, examining what happened would make an interesting case study in crisis management. A lot of the incident unfolded on the Internet — and on Twitter, specifically. The company even became a trending topic, as seen in this screenshot I took after lunchtime (I think around 2 PM Eastern time, although I only saved later):

The 5958 DAT was available on McAfee’s publicly-accessible HTTP and FTP download repositories until at least 1 PM Eastern, when I was checking on them.

The Windows and Mac anti-malware products from McAfee share DAT updates, which provide virus definitions. I was able to update VirusScan for Mac OS X to 5958 with no ill effects in the midst of the developing situation. (The problem only appears to have affected Windows XP systems.) Later, when McAfee had posted a newer update as version 5959, I was also able to download that.

Based on reports I saw on Twitter and the Web, McAfee was overwhelmed by this — particularly its call center and its Web-based customer forums. This allowed a lot of speculation and misinformation — along with humor — to break out.

I’ve saved this undoctored screen shot for a while. I figure I’ll end with it, even though it’s unrelated to the events of April 21.

I came across this hint about display properties on StackOverflow and thought it was worthwhile to write down for later. If you want to get the screen or Desktop resolution of a Mac via Python, you can do so with PyObjC.

First, let’s get the information about the main screen:

If you want just the horizontal and vertical resolution from that blob of data, you can pull the width and height out:

This might be useful in situations where you don’t have any of the “hundred of portable libs in Python that give you access to that information” — such as in your stock Mac OS X Python installation. To clarify: I’m in no way meaning to belittle that there are portable libraries that would let you do the same thing, but you also have to program for your audience and its constraints. One of the reasons I appreciate Python over some scripting languages is that you get so much capability in the Standard Library. However, on Mac OS X, you don’t get modules like pygame by default (yet … and maybe never) while you do get PyObjC.

I first posted to this blog on December 13, 1999. I had a Web site for years before that, but that was the date of my first recorded post to Irreality.

I don’t know how many blogs have been going for a decade, but when I realized that this one had, I thought it was worth mentioning. Plus, I haven’t posted in a while — even though I have quite a few ideas waiting in the wings.

When I started out Irreality, it was probably more of what you might call a “life stream” now. It has evolved into a much less personal and more technical outlet for me today. I think this change is natural given what has happened in my own life and, also, in the life of the Internet.

On the technical side, I began with a subscription to UserLand Manila and hosted it on my own server. I had been a user of UserLand’s Web scripting and development environment for several years already in 1999. I recall the jump to Manila being both exciting and familiar. It was fantastic to click “Edit this page,” and be able to do just that. I wouldn’t be surprised if most of the decade-plus blogs also started on Manila. (A few I can think of from that era are Backup Brain and Have Browser, Will Travel.)

I’m pretty sure the original server was either a Power Mac 7200 or 7500, running on my cable modem connection, with a hostname from DynDNS.org. Many years of collecting cast-off equipment were required to keep that system up and running at reasonable performance levels.

Somewhere along the way, I purchased a domain. What a leap that felt like at the time!

I finally gave up on Manila when it gave out on me earlier this decade. That allowed me to stop running the blog on my own hardware, on my own Internet connection, with my own power and so on. Unfortunately, I still haven’t converted all of my archives over to Drupal, the content management system I use today on a shared hosting environment. Sometimes, I wonder if that is for the better, but I still do aim to process that MT Import data.

I’d like to thank my wife for delivering a “happy blogiversary” cake with the requisite good humor.

I had an odd situation over the weekend that resulted in the inability to view the passwords associated with keys in my Mac OS X user keychain. Every time I clicked on the “Show password” checkbox in a key’s detail window, I’d get an “Access to this item is restricted” dialog.

Needless to say, this was disconcerting. I happened to have a lot of data in that keychain — this is what I get for keeping the same one around since Mac OS X 10.0 or 10.1. While I could revert to a backup, the newest backup wasn’t as recent as I would like. Plus, I just wanted to know why the problem had cropped up.

So, I asked about my problem on the Apple-CDSA mailing list. If anyone would be able to help with the obscure corners of keychains, I figured the people there would.

Very promptly, I got a reply from Ken McLeod, which led me to check the validity of the code signature on the Keychain Access utility.

Clearly, the signature and the application didn’t match. Something was amiss.

I reinstalled Mac OS X 10.6.2 on the system, using the latest combo update installer package, and cleared up the problem signature mismatch.

In retrospect, although I wouldn’t have thought of this being a problem, this breakage between the signature and the app — and its affect on my ability to view stored passwords — gives me confidence that thought has been put into the code signing mechanism in Mac OS X. You wouldn’t want a compromised app displaying your unencrypted keychain items, after all.

I had interesting things happen when I ran out of disk space today.

The most notable one was that I saw “Process completed” — or some variant of that — every time I tried to open a Terminal window with a new shell session. I briefly staved it off by specifying Bash as my shell, but then it came right back after opening another tab or two in Terminal. Consulting Google led me to this “Terminal application quits” thread at Apple Discussions. On a lark, I tried deleting /usr/bin/login as one poster suggested. It worked!

…But only for a little while. The problem returned. In the meantime, I had freed up some disk space because I’d realized I couldn’t save files anywhere (“But ~/Pictures is writable!”). Clearly something else had become an issue, because disk space was available.

Then I found another thread, “Terminal’s ’Process Completed’ message and /usr/bin/login,” on Apple Discussions. The more permanent solution from that thread appears to be the removal of corrupted Apple System Log databases. Once I did that and restarted the ASL service, all was well and has stayed that way so far.

Filling up my disk must have corrupted the logs as they were being written or rotated, and led to this cascade failure. Like I said, interesting!

One of the posters in the second Apple Discussions thread indicated that the underlying database corruption issue is addressed in Snow Leopard. However, it seems that you could still see this on Leopard — my experience was with a recently-patched Mac OS X 10.5.8 system.

The new Apple Education Licensing Program replaces the Apple Maintenance Program (AMP) as the primary way to purchase ongoing software upgrade rights for a school, college, or university’s fleet of Macintosh computers. The Apple Education Licensing Program (AELP? or just ELP?) is a yearly, renewable license.

I think this is a big deal because it’s awfully close to what I’ve asked Apple for year after year — especially at venues like WWDC (at least when they have presented the opportunity for giving constructive feedback).

The ELP licensing for Mac OS X is actually a bundle — called the “Mac Software Collection” — of the operating system combined with the iLife and iWork suites. (It aligns with the same bundle of software in the standalone “Mac Box Set.”) I believe that the bundling of iLife is the biggest win, because it provides upgrade rights to software that is bundled with every new Mac but frequently updated. If you are managing a larger group of Macs over several years, the licensing and deployment issues involved with iLife could be complex — moreso because it’s the kind of software that people want on their computers. It also doesn’t hurt that Keynote is included — anecdotally, it appears to sell a lot of Macs in organizations all by itself.

The ability to keep the operating system and core applications from the Mac Software Collection up-to-date across a range of Macs with a single renewable license could be a tremendous savings in administrative overhead.

Organizations must cover 100 percent of their installed base of owned or leased Macs, at least for the Mac Software Collection. This may be a deal-breaker for a number of universities and perhaps other organizations that tend to be decentralized in their operations.

Apple’s other software can also be obtained through ELP, but can be purchased to cover 100 percent of computers at the departmental level. It is possible that the exact nature of the organizational unit is at the organization’s discretion.

ELP allows the flexibility to cover faculty/staff home use as well as students, should the organization elect to pay for that additional coverage.

Each ELP purchase appears to incur a one-time 10 percent enrollment fee. If an organization doesn’t renew for a year but then buys again later, it may be subject to the enrollment fee again. And, if you have a lot of departments seeking Apple’s Pro Apps or IT-related software, those 10 percent charges could add up to significant overhead. I’m not sure if there’s a clear way to allow two or three departments to get the software they want without requiring an entire educational institution’s Macs be covered.

As part of the introduction of ELP, educational institutions are being encouraged to move to the new licensing program before December 13, 2009, through a waiver of the enrollment fee. It appears possible to crossgrade from AMP to ELP, at least if you talk to your Apple account team.

I am not aware whether Apple has rolled out something similar to organizations outside education.

I had a handy script I wrote on a plane years ago that let me block off my Entourage calendar at specific times each weekday for a given week. The times for these events were created by concatenating some strings and converting the result into an AppleScript date object. I mention that merely for background, and because it was an incredibly geeky way to automate the tedious process of blocking off lunch on my calendar (without resorting to recurring events).

I found that my script didn’t work in Snow Leopard — despite flawless operation across several successive major versions of Mac OS X. The dates themselves remained correct, but the times were all coming up as 12:00 a.m. instead of what was expected.

For example, here’s a simplified reproduction scenario you can try on Snow Leopard:

It turns out that the fix is easy if not exactly obvious: remove the periods from “a.m.” and “p.m.” before converting strings to date objects. (I use the periods because I follow the Associated Press Stylebook!)

So, there is a workaround in the unlikely event you encounter the same problem with your scripts.

Mac OS X Snow Leopard does not include Core Graphics bindings (CGBindings) for 64-bit Python.

The SWIG-based Python CGBindings originally shipped with Mac OS X 10.3, which bundled Python 2.3. Since that time, these bindings — specific to the system’s bundled framework build of Python — had allowed access to Core Graphics objects and commands from within scripts.

They were one of the reasons I decided to use Python in the first place. I thought they would be fun to learn and use, particularly with the then-new PDF Services feature of Mac OS X. The Core Graphics bindings also provided much, much more power than the command line sips tool and had an advantage over other alternatives by being bundled with the operating system. I thought they offered the possibility of growing with Mac OS X’s graphics hardware acceleration. I even found a way to use them to create better screenshots with drop shadows, a task where I’d previously employed Ambrosia’s Snapz Pro X.

Here’s an example of what you’ll see on Snow Leopard if you try to “import CoreGraphics” in 64-bit Python:

With 32-bit Python on Snow Leopard:

While the CGBindings are still available to 32-bit Python in Snow Leopard, you must use PyObjC to replace their functionality for 64-bit Python. Since 64-bit Python is the default in Snow Leopard, it makes sense to transition from the bindings to PyObjC as soon as possible. This means there is some porting work for scripts that used the Core Graphics bindings. I guess I’m glad I didn’t do as much with them as I’d planned.

I see this change as something of a loss. (Is this what Carbon developers are experiencing? Hm.) The Core Graphics bindings were relatively easy to use and felt reasonably Pythonic, even if the documentation was almost nonexistent. PyObjC feels more foreign to me when I attempt to use it — even though it’s clearly the future.

The Address Book application in Mac OS X Snow Leopard has a new telephone number label for contacts: “iPhone.” (Credit to Jeff Carlson for bringing it to my attention.)

What I find just as interesting as its existence is its order in the list. The “iPhone” label comes before “mobile,” the label I used for all cellular numbers. Is that a subtle dig to put the iPhone above other mobile phones?

It is also the only label that rates a capital letter.

I have no idea how or if this label will survive through Entourage Sync Services and Exchange synchronization. Hm.

Update: I wouldn’t advise using this label right now if you use Sync Services or otherwise sync data elsewhere. I’ve already lost cell numbers in Entourage with Sync Services enabled when I flipped an existing “mobile” number to “iPhone” and back.

Update: I have tested it twice with dummy contacts and could not reproduce the problem that resulted in the number being removed from both Entourage and Address Book. (I believe this is odd because it happened to two of my existing contacts when I flipped them to “iPhone” and back to “mobile.”) However, the “iPhone” number does definitely get removed from Entourage through Sync Services, which means you would lose the number on anything connected to an Exchange account (if Entourage is synchronizing with Exchange). … Such as an iPhone with Exchange ActiveSync.